Im Dezember erreichte der norwegische Schachspieler Magnus Carlsen mit einer Elo-Zahl von Punkten die höchste Wertungszahl weltweit. Wir bieten Vereinen oder Sportgruppen eine kostenlose Online-Verwaltung von Forderungs-Ranglisten (Pyramide / Tannenbaum) sowie ELO-Ranglisten für eine. Dies war insbesondere früher der Fall, als der Weltschachbund FIDE Schachspieler erst ab einer Wertungszahl von in die Rangliste aufnahm. Da die Elo-.
Elo-Rangliste im SchachportalKurzbeschreibung der Elo-Rangliste. Kurzbeschreibung Elo-Berechnung. Was ist die/eine Elozahl? In verschiedenen Zwei-Personen-Spielen (Go. Fabiano Caruana. Wir bieten Vereinen oder Sportgruppen eine kostenlose Online-Verwaltung von Forderungs-Ranglisten (Pyramide / Tannenbaum) sowie ELO-Ranglisten für eine.
Elo Rangliste Anna palautetta sivustostamme VideoRanking the Studio Albums: Electric Light Orchestra (ELO) WFM Lottoqouten Siegismund. Kollars, Dmitrij. Vor ca. Minic 0. Gaviota 1. FM Bilder Spielkarten Xu. Nicole Lorenz. Stockfish 4 bit 4CPU. Cheese 2. Houdini 2. Nemorino 5. Fat Fritz Junior w bit. Schnellschach - Top - Dezember 1. GM Robert Huebner. Feedback and Suggestions. GM Niclas Quicksilver Frauen. IM Lars Stark.
Kein Einsatz Elo Rangliste Ihnen investiert wurde. - NavigationsmenüStatista-Accounts: Zugriff auf alle Statistiken. rows · Diese Liste der Schachspieler mit einer Elo-Zahl von oder mehr enthält alle . Ranking/ELO Info. Created On November 27, by FACEIT Support. Häufig werden deshalb die Ratingzahlen auch als "Elo-Zahlen" bezeichnet. Die Ratingzahlen der FIDE beginnen bei Zahlen von (Amateur) und reichen bis zu über Die FIDE veröffentlichte bis Juli viermal jährlich neue Weltranglisten, deren Zahlen dann für das nächste Quartal Gültigkeit hatten. Mit den Listen vom September
Gaviota 1. Deep Sjeng c't Tucano 7. Deep Shredder 12 bit. The Baron 3. Onno 1. Tucano 9. Spark 0. Ethereal 8.
Shredder 12 bit. Amoeba 2. Thinker 5. Godel 6. Deep Junior Yokohama bit. Gull 1. Toga II 3. Deep Junior 13 bit. Deep Shredder 11 bit 4CPU.
Rodent II 0. DisasterArea 1. Francesca MAD 0. Gogobello 2. Asymptote 0. Deep Sjeng 3. Wasp 1. Counter 3.
Quazar 0. Fruit Reloaded 15th ann. Naum 2. Nemorino 1. Toga II 1. Gull 0. Rybka 1. Koivisto 3. DiscoCheck 5. Atlas 3. Bright 0.
Tornado 6. Glaurung 2. Tornado 8. Booot 5. Hiarcs 12 4CPU. Tornado 7. Hiarcs Paderborn 4CPU. Deep Fritz Octochess r bit 4CPU. MinkoChess 1. Tornado 4.
Tucano 8. Doch 1. Fruit Reloaded 3. Igel 1. Halogen 8 bit. Godel 5. Stash Vajolet2 1. Invictus r bit. Bobcat 6. Doch Hiarcs 11 4CPU.
Gaviota 0. Deep Junior 12 bit. Dirty 30Apr bit. Naum 3 bit. Monolith 1. Zappa Mexico II bit. Rodent 1. Minic 1. Chess Paderborn bit 4CPU. Nemo 1. Shield 2.
Cheese 2. Deep Shredder 11 bit. Mr Bob 0. BugChess2 1. Francisco Vallejo Pons. Anton Korobow. Oleksandr Areschtschenko.
Laurent Fressinet. Alexander Rjasanzew. Iwan Tscheparinow. Jurij Kryworutschko. Rustam Kasimjanov. Waleri Salow. Kirill Alexejenko. Denis Chismatullin.
Loek van Wely. Wladimir Hakobjan. Luke McShane. David Howell. Jeffery Xiong. Alexei Drejew. Alexander Beliavsky. Theresa Peters.
Lea Rieping. Rabea Schumann. Britta Leib. Gerda Strate. Anne Lukas. Olena Kosovska. Dagmar Aden. Johanna Ehmann. Constanze Wulf.
Nicole Nentwig. Anke Freter. Astrid Froehlich-Dill. Regina Heyne. Dietlind Meinke. Melanie Muedder. Madeleine Schardt. Karin Roos.
Estelle Morio. Monika Braje. Sana Fock. Christa Kaulfuss. Margarethe Wagner. Rosemarie Sand. Bianca Stolcz.
Lena Mader. Linda Becker. Sonja Noll. Amina Fock. Anna Schneider. Hannah Clara Roesler. Tiffany Kinzel. Blitzschach-Liste Top Blitzschach - Top - Dezember 1.
FM Jonah Krause. IM Andreas Schenk. IM Alexander Gasthofer. FM Marco Riehle. IM Lars Stark. IM Raoul Strohhaeker.
IM Robert Baskin. FM Frederik Svane. GM Jakob Meister. Thomas Bohn. Anthony Petkidis. FM Robert Stein. FM Hans Moehn.
FM Pascal Barzen. IM Bernhard Bayer. IM Sven Joachim. IM Thomas Fiebig. IM Christian Braun. GM Thomas Paehtz. IM Markus Schaefer. FM Leonid Sawlin.
IM Lev Yankelevich. Blitzschach-Liste Frauen Top Blitzschach Frauen - Top - Dezember 1. WFM Eveline Nuenchert. Michelle Viviane Frank.
Kathrin Schiffmann. Birgit Schneider. Andrea Schmidt. Luise Diederichs. WIM Martina Beltz. Germaine Helene Kickert. Jasmin Mangei.
Heidemarie Kluge. Nicole Lorenz. Cecilia Lange. Selina Moses. Shortcuts General Discussion. Questions and Answers.
Articles and Guides. Resources and Downloads. Live Streaming and Videos. Tournaments 2v2 World Cup Winters War Team DM.
Masters of RMS. Knights of the Empire. Double Cup. Master of the Circus. Outback Rumble. Terra Nova.
Brotherhood Tournaments. Using ratings to compare players between different eras is made more difficult when inflation or deflation are present.
See also Comparison of top chess players throughout history. It is commonly believed that, at least at the top level, modern ratings are inflated.
For instance Nigel Short said in September , "The recent ChessBase article on rating inflation by Jeff Sonas would suggest that my rating in the late s would be approximately equivalent to in today's much debauched currency".
By when he made this comment, would only have ranked him 65th, while would have ranked him equal 10th. It has been suggested that an overall increase in ratings reflects greater skill.
The advent of strong chess computers allows a somewhat objective evaluation of the absolute playing skill of past chess masters, based on their recorded games, but this is also a measure of how computerlike the players' moves are, not merely a measure of how strongly they have played.
The number of people with ratings over has increased. Around there was only one active player Anatoly Karpov with a rating this high.
In Viswanathan Anand was only the 8th player in chess history to reach the mark at that point of time. The current benchmark for elite players lies beyond One possible cause for this inflation was the rating floor, which for a long time was at , and if a player dropped below this they were stricken from the rating list.
As a consequence, players at a skill level just below the floor would only be on the rating list if they were overrated, and this would cause them to feed points into the rating pool.
By July it had increased to In a pure Elo system, each game ends in an equal transaction of rating points. If the winner gains N rating points, the loser will drop by N rating points.
This prevents points from entering or leaving the system when games are played and rated. However, players tend to enter the system as novices with a low rating and retire from the system as experienced players with a high rating.
Therefore, in the long run a system with strictly equal transactions tends to result in rating deflation. In , the USCF acknowledged that several young scholastic players were improving faster than the rating system was able to track.
As a result, established players with stable ratings started to lose rating points to the young and underrated players. Several of the older established players were frustrated over what they considered an unfair rating decline, and some even quit chess over it.
Because of the significant difference in timing of when inflation and deflation occur, and in order to combat deflation, most implementations of Elo ratings have a mechanism for injecting points into the system in order to maintain relative ratings over time.
FIDE has two inflationary mechanisms. First, performances below a "ratings floor" are not tracked, so a player with true skill below the floor can only be unrated or overrated, never correctly rated.
Second, established and higher-rated players have a lower K-factor. Rating floors in the United States work by guaranteeing that a player will never drop below a certain limit.
This also combats deflation, but the chairman of the USCF Ratings Committee has been critical of this method because it does not feed the extra points to the improving players.
A possible motive for these rating floors is to combat sandbagging, i. Human—computer chess matches between Deep Blue versus Garry Kasparov and demonstrated that chess computers are capable of defeating even the strongest human players.
However, chess engine ratings are difficult to quantify, due to variable factors such as the time control and the hardware the program runs on.
Published engine rating lists such as CCRL are based on engine-only games on standard hardware configurations and are not directly comparable to FIDE ratings.
The Elo rating system is used in the chess portion of chess boxing. In order to be eligible for professional chess boxing, one must have an Elo rating of at least , as well as competing in 50 or more matches of amateur boxing or martial arts.
American college football used the Elo method as a portion of its Bowl Championship Series rating systems from to after which the BCS was replaced by the College Football Playoff.
The use of rating systems was effectively scrapped with the creation of the College Football Playoff in ; participants in the CFP and its associated bowl games are chosen by a selection committee.
In other sports, individuals maintain rankings based on the Elo algorithm. These are usually unofficial, not endorsed by the sport's governing body.
The World Football Elo Ratings is an example of the method applied to men's football. It is the official rating system of major organizations such as the Intercollegiate Tennis Association and World TeamTennis and is frequently used in segments on the Tennis Channel.
The algorithm analyzes more than 8 million match results from over , tennis players worldwide. On May 8, , Rafael Nadal — having won 46 consecutive sets in clay court matches — had a near-perfect clay UTR of One of the few Elo-based rankings endorsed by a sport's governing body is the FIFA Women's World Rankings , based on a simplified version of the Elo algorithm, which FIFA uses as its official ranking system for national teams in women's football.
In , Nate Silver, editor-in-chief of the statistical commentary website FiveThirtyEight , and Reuben Fischer-Baum produced Elo ratings for every National Basketball Association team and season through the season.
An Elo-based ranking of National Hockey League players has been developed. National Scrabble organizations compute normally distributed Elo ratings except in the United Kingdom , where a different system is used.
The North American Scrabble Players Association has the largest rated population of active members, numbering about 2, as of early Lexulous also uses the Elo system.
New players are assigned a rating of , with the best humans and bots rating over VogClub sets a new player's rating at Despite questions of the appropriateness of using the Elo system to rate games in which luck is a factor, trading-card game manufacturers often use Elo ratings for their organized play efforts.
However, the DCI abandoned this system in in favour of a new cumulative system of "Planeswalker Points", chiefly because of the above-noted concern that Elo encourages highly rated players to avoid playing to "protect their rating".
Similarly, Decipher, Inc. The Esports game Overwatch , the basis of the unique Overwatch League professional sports organization , uses a derivative of the Elo system to rank competitive players with various adjustments made between competitive seasons.